<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Need Your Input on a New Adgitize Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adgitize.net/blog/2010/03/09/we-need-your-input-on-a-new-adgitize-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adgitize.net/blog/2010/03/09/we-need-your-input-on-a-new-adgitize-service/</link>
	<description>World Class Advertising on a Blogger's Budget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:45:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Egan</title>
		<link>http://www.adgitize.net/blog/2010/03/09/we-need-your-input-on-a-new-adgitize-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Egan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adgitize.net/blog/?p=229#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>I think you explained the logic very well. The reward system works! &quot;You have to remember that advertisers that don’t publish aren’t drawing points or income from the system.&quot; There will always be different strokes for different folks. Keep up good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you explained the logic very well. The reward system works! &#8220;You have to remember that advertisers that don’t publish aren’t drawing points or income from the system.&#8221; There will always be different strokes for different folks. Keep up good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kexbrown</title>
		<link>http://www.adgitize.net/blog/2010/03/09/we-need-your-input-on-a-new-adgitize-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>kexbrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adgitize.net/blog/?p=229#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>We are an advertising network first and foremost. Our goal is to show ads on publisher blogs. We reward publishers for their clicking efforts in a way to help them compete with larger blogs. 

Imagine two blogs. One has a lot of traffic, writes often but not daily, has years of online linking and gets a lot of organic traffic from the search engines. The second blog is new to the world of blogging, but blogs daily and has little to no organic traffic. 

In the old advertiser / publisher paradigm the second blog would get a penny for every dollar the first blog received as a publisher? Why, because the first blogger will see 1000 visitors to every 10 visitors to the small blogger.

The ability to be rewarded for clicks, articles and ad impressions, increases the chance for the small blogger to receive some income for their publishing efforts. In fact, in our network the small blogger gets about the same or within 60% as much as the large blogger.

Clicking and writing articles are the great equalizer in the Adgitize system. But, as an advertising network, we would like to see more advertisers. Not just advertisers that want to engage in our click and publish network. Entrecard appears to be doing quite well with that model.

I am assuming based on the number of advertisers that advertise but don&#039;t click or show ads, that our system is working for them, despite lowered click through rates because they don&#039;t show the Adgitize Ad Groups. We consistently see advertisers renewing their ads regularly which means to me that they are gaining value in the current system. Whether it is more traffic to a small blog or brand recognition throughout the 10,000 blogs in our network, the advertiser is gaining value.

You have to remember that advertisers that don&#039;t publish aren&#039;t drawing points or income from the system. This means more revenue is available to the publishers that have chosen to work our system.

I think having these advertisers is good for the whole membership despite the hardship of reaching these links with no gold clicks at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are an advertising network first and foremost. Our goal is to show ads on publisher blogs. We reward publishers for their clicking efforts in a way to help them compete with larger blogs. </p>
<p>Imagine two blogs. One has a lot of traffic, writes often but not daily, has years of online linking and gets a lot of organic traffic from the search engines. The second blog is new to the world of blogging, but blogs daily and has little to no organic traffic. </p>
<p>In the old advertiser / publisher paradigm the second blog would get a penny for every dollar the first blog received as a publisher? Why, because the first blogger will see 1000 visitors to every 10 visitors to the small blogger.</p>
<p>The ability to be rewarded for clicks, articles and ad impressions, increases the chance for the small blogger to receive some income for their publishing efforts. In fact, in our network the small blogger gets about the same or within 60% as much as the large blogger.</p>
<p>Clicking and writing articles are the great equalizer in the Adgitize system. But, as an advertising network, we would like to see more advertisers. Not just advertisers that want to engage in our click and publish network. Entrecard appears to be doing quite well with that model.</p>
<p>I am assuming based on the number of advertisers that advertise but don&#8217;t click or show ads, that our system is working for them, despite lowered click through rates because they don&#8217;t show the Adgitize Ad Groups. We consistently see advertisers renewing their ads regularly which means to me that they are gaining value in the current system. Whether it is more traffic to a small blog or brand recognition throughout the 10,000 blogs in our network, the advertiser is gaining value.</p>
<p>You have to remember that advertisers that don&#8217;t publish aren&#8217;t drawing points or income from the system. This means more revenue is available to the publishers that have chosen to work our system.</p>
<p>I think having these advertisers is good for the whole membership despite the hardship of reaching these links with no gold clicks at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharkbytes</title>
		<link>http://www.adgitize.net/blog/2010/03/09/we-need-your-input-on-a-new-adgitize-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>sharkbytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adgitize.net/blog/?p=229#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why you don&#039;t require sites to include at least one Adgitize Ad. My poll showed that people do try to avoid sites that don&#039;t display any. Generally, the sites that don&#039;t have one are either really new, and they haven&#039;t figured out that it helps them, or they are sites that are selling things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you don&#8217;t require sites to include at least one Adgitize Ad. My poll showed that people do try to avoid sites that don&#8217;t display any. Generally, the sites that don&#8217;t have one are either really new, and they haven&#8217;t figured out that it helps them, or they are sites that are selling things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

